RSS Feed
Tampilkan postingan dengan label consumption. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label consumption. Tampilkan semua postingan

Consumption Surpasses Production for Grain

Posted by Flora Sawita Labels: , , , , ,

Increases in grain production brought about by irrigation and synthetic fertilizer-pesticide inputs have peaked and begun declining. As consumption surpasses production, the world's stocks of stored grain have been falling relative to each year's use. When supply can no longer meet demand, free market price competition may starve the poor.




Source

What Oil Dependency Problem...

Posted by Flora Sawita Labels: , , , ,

When you have a problem, lets say for example being an alcoholic, the first step is to admit that there is a problem.  Therefore, I suggest that nearly every person in the U.S. needs to stand up right now and say, out loud, "I, (insert your name here), drive a car everyday and have an addicition to oil."  There, doesn't that feel better?


I say nearly because there are many of us that attempt to witdrawl ourselves from the oil consumption equation, but even with serious effort it is close to impossible to completely irradicate ourselves (maybe you take the bus, Zip Car, etc).  According to the U.S. Government the increase in dollars spent over the last few years has grown at an exponential level as
 witnessed by the below graph.

Additionally, we have gone from below $1 billion to near $300 billion in a matter of 35 years.  This does not account for the consumption of many of the worlds fastest growing consumers,
 China and India.  When we figure about how much oil we will be able to squeeze out of our planet we must think about these consumers and about where this will leave us over the next 35 years?

This leads us to consider how soon we are going to approach peak oil conditions on our planet. Peak oil is defined by Wikipedia as, "the point in time when the maximum rate of global  petroleum extraction is reached, after which the rate of production enters terminal decline".  This is a topic of much debate amongst scientists, because no one knows how much oil was present when we first began harvesting oil.  Some scientists believe that it has already passed, we are already in the decline stage; while others feel as though we have many years left.  However, despite how you measure it there is one evident fact in any case, we ARE going to run out of oil.  This is something that we all must figure into our daily consumption decisions or else we will end up in a similar boat (or car) as this cartoon by Tom Tomorrow depicts.
We are on a fast track down a slippery slope and if each of us doesn't do something to stop this then we all will have to face the consequences and we all will have to take responsibility.

Another way to approach our dilema is to view the economic effects of our oil consumption habits.  Somewhere near the mid 1980's it became more expensive to pull oil out of the ground in the U.S. then to import it from another country.  This was due to the huge capital overhead involved with oil drilling and production, U.S. companies found it very difficult to operate domestically and still turn a profit.  Therefore, as depicted by the below graph we began a steady climb up the hill of imports.  Each year, as our consumption increases, this trend will become gradually worse, with the exception of 2008 when crude oil prices were exceptionally high and the companies holding on to the oil rights in the U.S. decided to begin drilling because the profits had returned to the industry.  However, this trend is already on the decline with many of those sites never reaching completion, because of the change in oil prices again.  This leaves us in a position of shipping most of our money overseas, to unstable governments in countries that are claiming huge gains on our habits.  

Therefore, I propose that we all consider each and every idea that is proposed on this site and others like it.  I am not saying that these ideas are valid, they all need some research, but I am saying that we should at least consider each of them.  We must be careful not to fall into the "that's ridiculous" trap, where we think putting air in our tires for 5% increased mpg is not worth it.  Of course it's worth it!  Every little bit helps because we do not have an end game yet.  The world governments have not yet put a plan into action that will allow us to move away from oil.  I don't know whether it will be hydrogen, nuclear, or some other form of alternative bio-fuel, but one thing I do know is it won't be oil forever.  Since we have started commercial production and record keeping we have consumed 900 million barrels, it is believed that there is approximately 1 - 2 billion barrels of oil left in the planet, depending on who you trust (scientists or the U.S. government).  By my math that leaves the fuel gauge on the planet close to 1/2 full with no "gas stations" in sight on the horizon.  Are we going to continue driving with our pedal to the floorboard and watch the guage drop?  Or, are we going to slowly release the pedal, adjust to the new speed, and spend our saved resources on research to alleviate the pressure on our planets natural resources?  It's your decision...

Our Children, Their Market Sector

Posted by Flora Sawita Labels: , , , ,

Through various media, such as movies and TV programs, we have become conscious to the fact that our children are being directly marketed to by large corporations with huge budgets. One of the large problems is the pervasiveness of advertising that bombards our children with messages that we do not support or undermines our values. While we are aware of companies like McDonalds and WalMart targeting our kids, we rarely expect to see it in our school systems. However, as any parent can attest, the advertising and the acceptance of advertising by schools, teachers, and parents has become outrageous.

Gone are the days when just local businesses supported a football or basketball team. Now we are bombarded with magazine subscription requests, cookie dough clubs, and other corporately organized fund raising. I, like many others, support the activity of fund raising by kids for a field trip or new band uniforms, however, modern fund raising has taken on a whole new marketing sector by enlisting children to encourage others to buy, buy, buy. Schools hang large banners with logos, distribute logoed collection jars, and host various other forms of subconscious advertising. Children are not just learning in schools, but becoming more accepting of marketing ploys from an early age. According to a recent article on Commercial Alert, the impact of all this marketing has demonstrated that “higher materialistic values are related to factors such as lower self-esteem, chronic physical symptoms, and higher rates of anxiety, depression and psychological distress” (http://www.commercialalert.org/issues/education/k12-schools/school-children-thrown-overboard-into-commercial-sea).

The toll of marketing doesn’t stop there. Kids are encouraged to “go green” and often with products that aren’t living up to the name. Through corporate sponsorships, corporations are gaining access to students, according to The International Encyclopedia of Environmental Politics:

“…through the development and distribution of ‘educational’ material to schools. The potential to shape environmental perceptions and improve corporate images at the same time attracts many customers to the firms designing educational materials for corporations. These materials inevitably give a corporate view of environmental problems and portray activities such as clear cutting forests, coal mining and nuclear power as environmentally friendly.”

As more funding is funneled into our public schools, we can expect to see more information passed to our children that include misinformation about fossil fuels and the use of natural resources. Isn’t the ultimate case of greenwashing when the children are involved?

- Gina Mason

Visit our website:

http://sites.google.com/site/ecomerge2008/

Are YOU Green?

Posted by Flora Sawita Labels: , , ,

Saturday, November 29, 2008

Are You Being Greenwashed?



After researching about Greenwashing and finding out how naive I have been as a consumer; I thought that I need to become more aware and informed. After reasearching and educating myself I found a wonderful article from the Greenpeace website that discusses the 4 criteria for determing if something is greenwashing or not:

4 criterias:

Dirty Business - Touting an environmental program or product, while the corporation's product or core business is inherently polluting or unsustainable. For example, if a company brags about its boutique green R&D projects but the majority of spending and investment reinforces old, unsustainable, polluting practices.

Ad Bluster - Using targeted advertising and public relations campaigns to exaggerate an environmental achievement in order to divert attention away from environmental problems or if it spends more money advertising an environmental achievement than actually doing it. For example, if a company were to do a million dollar ad campaign about a clean up that cost less.
Political Spin - Advertising or speaking about corporate "green" commitments while lobbying against pending or current environmental laws and regulations. For example, if advertising or public statements are used to emphasize corporate environmental responsibility in the midst of legislative pressure or legal action.
It's the Law, Stupid! - Advertising or branding a product with environmental achievements that are already required or mandated by existing laws. For example, if an industry or company has been forced to change a product, clean up its pollution or protect an endangered species, then uses PR campaigns to make such action look proactive or voluntary.


These 4 criterias can be viewed on http://stopgreenwash.org/


Hope they can help you become better informed as they have done for me!

Cynthia Pestner

Visit our site:

http://sites.google.com/site/ecomerge2008/

Label

2011 News AGRIBISNIS APINDO Africa Agriculture Business Agriculture Land Argentina Australia Bangladesh Berita Berita Detikcom Berita Info Jambi Berita Kompas Berita Padang Ekspres Berita Riau Pos Berita Riau Today Berita Tempo Berita riau terkini Biodiesel Bursa Malaysia CPO Tender Summary Cattle and Livestock China Cocoa Company Profile Corn Cotton Crude Palm Oil (CPO) and Palm Kernel Oil (PKO) Dairy Dairy Products Edible Oil Euorope European Union (EU) FDA and USDA Fertilizer Flood Food Inflation Food Security Fruit Futures Futures Cocoa and Coffee Futures Edible Oil Futures Soybeans Futures Wheat Grain HUKUM India Indonesia Info Sawit Investasi Invitation Jarak pagar Kakao Kapas Karet Kebun Sawit BUMN Kebun Sawit Swasta Kelapa sawit Kopi Law Lowongan Kerja MPOB Malaysia Meat News Nilam Oil Palm Oil Palm - Elaeis guineensis PENGUPAHAN PERDA Pakistan Palm Oil News Panduan Pabrik Kelapa Sawit Penawaran menarik Pesticide and Herbicide Poultry REGULASI RSPO Rice SAWIT Serba-serbi South America Tebu Technical Comment (CBOT Soyoil) Technical Comment (DJI) Technical Comment (FCPO) Technical Comment (FKLI) Technical Comment (KLSE) Technical Comment (NYMEX Crude) Technical Comment (SSE) Technical Comment (USD/MYR) Teknik Kimia Thailand Trader's Event Trader's highlight USA Ukraine Usaha benih Vietnam Wheat benih bermutu benih kakao benih kelapa benih palsu benih sawit benih sawit unggul bibit sawit unggul biofuel biogas budidaya sawit corporation palm oil pembelian benih sawit perburuhan pertanian soybean umum varietas unggul